OpenSSL 0.9.8y, 1.0.0k, 1.0.1e

New OpenSSL updates:

Direct Links:
http://indy.fulgan.com/SSL/openssl-0.9.8y-i386-win32.zip
http://indy.fulgan.com/SSL/openssl-0.9.8y-x64_86-win64.zip
http://indy.fulgan.com/SSL/openssl-1.0.0k-i386-win32.zip
http://indy.fulgan.com/SSL/openssl-1.0.0k-x64_86-win64.zip
http://indy.fulgan.com/SSL/openssl-1.0.1e-i386-win32.zip
http://indy.fulgan.com/SSL/openssl-1.0.1e-x64_86-win64.zip

Recommended Versions highlighted.

I am going to post about the changes to my blog, the DEC and so on in a few weeks. Stay tuned! Had been a busy time 🙂

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “OpenSSL 0.9.8y, 1.0.0k, 1.0.1e

  1. You should make a post explaining the project and make the post visible in all pages of the blog. Something like ‘about us’, but to the project you cover.
    I find the lack of information disturbing. 🙂
    But your work are really appreciated. (:

    • Yes, but you have to use a newer Indy version as the one shipped with D7. I cannot provide tests & support for such old versions (12 years old!). Feel free to ask in the Embarcadero Forums or on StackOverflow for help to update Indy in D7, I am sure there are enough people who can help.

    • I don’t know what you mean by “New Indy” but no, sorry. There are currently no plans to support static builds as I already have to support a wide range of OS, 32/64 bit and OpenSSL branches. Too much for for the spare time to support static builds, as well. Wondering why you where asking for static builds? There is no benefit over a dynamic link library (regarding the “hooking possibility”: security is not a question of a linked library but the overall system. I can hook the functions easily when linked statically, too).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s